Category Opinions
Opinion No. 032/2026

Need for further refinement and coordination regarding the ban on infestation-independent permanent baiting in food and feed production facilities

What it's about:

Rodents such as mice and rats are often carriers of pathogenic bacteria, viruses or parasites. They are particularly undesirable in food and feed production facilities, as they can introduce pathogens and, for example, transmit them to farm animals or carry them into the food chain. They therefore, pose a risk to the health of animals and humans and can also impair the quality and quantity of feed.

For these reasons, businesses that produce food and animal feed have a legal obligation to prevent contamination risks and to comply with hygiene measures. These include appropriate pest control methods, such as so-called ‘infestation-independent permanent baiting’ (in German “Befallsunabhängige Dauerbeköderung, abbreviated as “BUD”). Anticoagulants are frequently used as active ingredients in such baits. These are substances that inhibit blood clotting in rodents. When placed in hard-to-reach areas, they can help to control unwanted rodents.

However, BUD is set to be banned in future for environmental and animal welfare reasons. Discussions are currently underway as to whether an exemption from the ban can and should be granted for the particularly hygiene-sensitive food and feed sectors, as demanded by the food industry. A fundamental prerequisite for such a derogation is that the anticoagulant active substances must continue to be permitted for use across the EU. This is currently being discussed within the European Commission’s Standing Committee on Biocidal Products (SCBP). Background: As the basis for national authorizations of biocidal products, fundamental decisions are first taken at EU level, which are th

1 Subject of the assessment

The food industry is calling for permanent baiting (BUD), regardless of infestation, to remain permitted and for an exemption to be granted for the hygiene-sensitive food and feed sectors.

• Having assessed the situation, the BfRshort forGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment sets out its position on this request below and provides an assessment of its feasibility and the scope for action within the current procedures. Specifically, the requirements are as follows: firstly, to advocate for the retention of active substance authorisations for permanent baiting with anticoagulants at European level, so that the BUD can continue to be used in Germany as an exemption for the food and feed sectors;

• and, as a second step, to ensure that product authorisation in Germany provides for the BUD as a derogation for the particularly hygiene-sensitive food and feed sectors where there is a risk of infestation, as the reasons for the maintaining derogation for the food and feed sectors remain unchanged.

2 Results

From the BfR’s perspective, rodents in establishments with highly sensitive hygiene areas – such as in the pharmaceutical and medical technology sectors or in food and feed production facilities – pose a significant risk to human health as carriers of bacterial, viral and parasitic zoonotic pathogens, as they carry numerous pathogenic microorganisms in their intestines, urine and, where applicable, on their fur, and can bring these into production environments. Due to their high mobility, rodents can spread pathogens between waste areas, sewer systems and production zones, thereby contaminating both raw and finished products. Legally, food businesses are obliged to prevent such contamination risks by taking measures to prevent acute infestations. Under Regulation (EC) No 852/2004, businesses must therefore comply with general hygiene measures. Specifically, Annex II requires the protection of premises against pest infestation, rather than merely combating an infestation that has already been detected. In the event of such an infestation, a closure of the premises is generally the first possibility to be considered. To prevent thissituation, suitable pest control methods must be used (Chapter IX, No. 4), which include the BUD.

BUD is also necessary in the feed sector to prevent serious consequences for animal health and the transmission of pathogens via farm animals into the food chain. Rodents are frequently found on poultry and pig farms as well as in warehouses, and act as vectors and reservoirs for a wide range of pathogens. Rats can shed zoonotic pathogens, bring them into livestock housing and transmit them to feed, water troughs and contact surfaces. This increases the risk of infection among animals. Furthermore, rodents not only release pathogens that impair animal welfare and performance, but they also cause significant losses in feed quantities in feed stores through direct consumption losses. Feed quality is reduced as they contaminate the feed with faeces, urine and saliva. The BUD, containing anticoagulant active ingredients, is effective in hard-to-reach areas. Bait stations can be placed behind equipment and in storage areas where traps are difficult to set. Effective control of the rodent population thus lowers the risk of infection in farm animals, reduces losses due to disease and improves overall animal welfare and performance parameters – and ultimately has an impact on humans via the food chain.

Any decision regarding the BUD is therefore inherently linked not only to economic and environmental considerations, but also to a balancing of health interests.

2.1 Current status and scope for action regarding the ban on BUD

A decision on whether to extend the authorisation of anticoagulant active substances is currently pending before the European Commission’s Standing Committee on Biocidal Products (SCBP). In order to secure a derogation for the use of BUD – which is to be banned outright – in hygiene-sensitive food and feed sectors, a corresponding provision is required in the European Commission’s implementing regulations.

In the ongoing procedure, a more comprehensive assessment of the potential health impacts has so far been largely overlooked, as has an examination of the actual practical feasibility of implementation in business operations.

From the perspective of health risk assessment, there is an urgent need for improvements and coordination in this regard.

3 Rationale

Rodents pose a significant risk as carriers of bacterial, viral and parasitic zoonotic pathogens in facilities with highly sensitive hygiene areas, such as those in the pharmaceutical and medical technology sectors or in food and feed production facilities (Han et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2016), as they carry numerous pathogenic microorganisms in their intestines, urine and, in some cases, on their fur, and can introduce these into production environments. Particularly relevant bacterial pathogens include Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Yersinia enterocolica, Leptospira spp., Listeria monocytogenes and pathogenic Escherichia coli (e.g. STECshort forShiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli) (Basiouni et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2025; Jahan et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2021; Meerburg and Kijlstra, 2007). Transmission occurs predominantly via the faecal-oral route through faecal and urinary contamination of raw materials, feed, food, surfaces, equipment and packaging materials, but also indirectly via dust and wastewater.

Rats may also be infected with various viral zoonotic pathogens, which, following transmission to humans, can in individual cases lead to severe illness (Ulrich et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2023). For instance, isolated cases of Seoul hantavirus infection have occurred in Germany, which were attributable to transmission from rats (Hofmann et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2020). The Seoul hantavirus can cause severe illness with acute kidney damage, although a route of transmission via contaminated food has not yet been described. Furthermore, the rat hepatitis E virus (rat HEV) is widespread among wild rats in Germany (Panajotov et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2024). In individual cases, it can also be transmitted to humans and lead to acute or chronic hepatitis (Mueller et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2025). Transmission of this virus via food contaminated with rat excreta appears possible, although the exact routes of transmission of rat HEV remain unclear at present. Rats can also carry human-pathogenic pathogens without replicating them themselves. For example, human norovirus – one of the most significant foodborne viral species – has been detected in the faecal matter of rats (Wolf et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2013). Furthermore, a metagenomic analysis of the faecal contents of wild rats from Germany revealed the presence of potentially zoonotic gastroenteritis pathogens such as rotaviruses, sapoviruses and astroviruses (Sachsenröder et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2014).

Parasitic zoonotic pathogens can also be transmitted by rats and other synanthropic rodents and, in individual cases, cause severe illness in humans. Relevant parasitic zoonotic pathogens include, in particular, protozoa such as Giardia intestinalis, Cryptosporidium spp. and Toxoplasma gondiias well as helminths such as Hymenolepis nana or Trichinella spiralis (Rodriguez-Morales et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2025). In the present context, particular significance is attached to those parasitic zoonotic pathogens that are transmitted via the faecal-oral route through the ingestion of infectious developmental stages.

Infectious stages such as cysts (Giardia intestinalis) or oocysts (Cryptosporidium spp.) can be introduced into the environment, production facilities, foodstuffs, raw materials and surfaces via the faeces of infected rodents, thereby posing a significant risk of infection to humans (Lishort forlithium et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2023, Rojas-Lopez et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2022, Rodriguez-Morales et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2025, EFSAshort forEuropean Food Safety Authority BIOHAZ Panel 2018). For the zoonotic pathogens Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. epidemiological and molecular biological findings confirm the presence of human-pathogenic species or zoonotically relevant assemblages in synanthropic rodents, as well as of rodent-associated Cryptosporidium species in humans, which supports a plausible role for rats as a source of contamination, particularly in areas relevant to food hygiene (Rasková et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2013; Rojas-López et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2022; Stensvold et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2024). Due to the low infectious dose and the limited chemical inactivation of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia intestinalis, the prevention of contamination plays a central role (EFSAshort forEuropean Food Safety Authority BIOHAZ Panel, 2018).

In the case of the helminth Hymenolepis nana, in addition to faecal-oral transmission to humans, transmission is also possible – as with Hymenolepis diminuta – through human ingestion of beetles infected via rat faeces in contaminated foodstuffs (Thompson 2015, Voge et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 1957, Mijatović et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2024, Strand et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2019, Coello Peralta et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2023).

With regard to Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spiralis, transmission of parasitic zoonotic pathogens from rats consumed by farm animals to humans is possible. Pigs can become infected through the ingestion of infected rodents and their carcasses (Rodriguez-Morales et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2025). Transmission to humans can occur through the consumption of raw or inadequately cooked or treated pork (EFSAshort forEuropean Food Safety Authority BIOHAZ Panel, 2018; Opsteegh et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2015). In the case of Trichinella spp., this route of transmission is monitored through the legally required trichinella testing, whereas no comparable routine meat testing exists for Toxoplasma gondii. Under inadequately controlled production and processing conditions, a risk of infection cannot be ruled out.

Due to their high mobility, rodents can spread pathogens between waste areas, sewerage systems and production zones, thereby contaminating both raw and finished products. Food businesses are legally obliged to prevent such contamination risks. Under Regulation (EC) No 852/2004, establishments must comply with general hygiene measures; specifically, Annex II requires the protection of premises against pest infestation and the use of appropriate pest control methods (Chapter IX, No 4).

From a feed safety perspective, the controlled, permanent baiting of rodents with anticoagulant active substances prevents serious consequences for animal health and the transmission of pathogens via farm animals into the food chain (Jahan et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2021). It is not uncommon for Salmonella, Campylobacter and other zoonotic pathogens, as well as bacterial and viral pathogens, to be identified in connection with rodent populations on livestock farms (Backhans et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others") 2012, Domanska-Blicharz et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others") 2023). Consistent rodent control is essential, particularly with regard to zoonoses. Rodents are frequently found on poultry and pig farms, as well as in warehouses, and act as vectors and reservoirs for a wide range of pathogens. Rats can shed zoonotic pathogens, introduce them into livestock housing and transmit them to feed, water troughs and contact surfaces. This increases the risk of infection in animals. Relevant zoonotic pathogens include, for example, Toxoplasma gondii, Leptospira and Campylobacter spp., as well as certain serovars of Salmonella (Backhans et al.short foret alii (lat. "and others"), 2012). 

Furthermore, rodents not only release pathogens that impair animal welfare and performance, but they also cause significant losses in feed quantities in feed stores through direct feed wastage. In addition, they reduce feed quality by contaminating it with faeces, urine and saliva. Permanent baiting with anticoagulant active ingredients is effective in hard-to-reach areas. Bait stations can be placed behind equipment and in storage areas where traps are difficult to set. An effective reduction in the rodent population thus lowers the risk of infection in farm animals, reduces losses due to disease and improves animal welfare and performance parameters overall – and ultimately also has an impact on humans via the food chain. In the BfR’s view, the existing data do not yet allow for a reliable assessment of whether and to what extent the current level of protection can be maintained without BUD.

4 References

Backhans, A., Fellströmm, C. Rodents on pig and chicken farms – a potential threat to human and animal health. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2012;2.External Link: https://doi.org/10.3402/iee.v2i0.17093

Basiouni, S., Rodriguez-Morales, A. J., Shehata, A. A., Duarte, P. M. (2025). Silent Carriers: The Role of Rodents in the Emergence of Zoonotic Bacterial Threats. Pathogens, 14(9), 928.External Link: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14090928

Coello Peralta, R. D., Salazar Mazamba, M. L., Pazmiño Gómez, B. J., Cushicóndor Collaguazo, D. M., Gómez Landires, E. A., & Ramallo, G. (2023). Hymenolepiasis Caused by Hymenolepis nana in Humans and Natural Infection in Rodents in a Marginal Urban Sector of Guayaquil, Ecuador. The American Journal of Case Reports. 24, e939476.External Link: https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.939476

Domanska-Blicharz, K., Opolska, J., Lisowska, A., Szczotka-Bochniarz, A. Bacterial and Viral Rodent-borne Infections on Poultry Farms. An Attempt at a Systematic Review. J Vet Res. 16 March 2023;67(1):1–10.External Link: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2023-0012

EFSAshort forEuropean Food Safety Authority BIOHAZ Panel (EFSAshort forEuropean Food Safety Authority Panel on Biological Hazards), Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Alvarez-Ordóñez, A., Bolton, D., Bover-Cid, S., Chemaly, M., Davies, R., De Cesare, A.

Han, B. A., Kramer A. M., Drake J. M. (2016). Global Patterns of Zoonotic Disease in Mammals. Trends in Parasitology, 32(7), 565–577.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2016.04.007

Herman, L., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cacciò, S., Chalmers, R., Deplazes, P., Devleesschauwer, B., Innes, E., Romig, T., van der Giessen, J., Hempen, M., Van der Stede, Y., Robertson, L. (2018). Scientific Opinion on the public health risks associated with food-borne parasites. EFSAshort forEuropean Food Safety Authority Journal. 16(12):5495, 113.External Link: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5495

Hofmann, J., Heuser, E., Weiss, S., Tenner, B., Schoppmeyer, K., Esser, J....Kruger, D. H. (2020). Autochthonous rat-borne Seoul virus infection in a woman with acute kidney injury. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26(12), 3096–3099. External Link:https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2612.200708

Jahan, N. A., Lindsey, L. L., Larsen, P. A. (2021). The Role of Peridomestic Rodents as Reservoirs for Zoonotic Foodborne Pathogens. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 21(3), 133–148. External Link:https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2020.2640

Lishort forlithium, J., Qin, H., Lishort forlithium, X., & Zhang, L. (2023). Role of rodents in the zoonotic transmission of giardiasis. One Health. 16(100500).External Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100500

Meerburg, B. G., Kijlstra, A. (2007). Role of rodents in the transmission of Salmonella and Campylobacter. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87, 2774–2781.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3004

Mijatović, S., Štajner, T., Čolović Čalovski, I., Dubljanin, E., Bobić, B., Leković, Z., Barać, A., Džamić, A. M. (2024). Human infections by Hymenolepis diminuta in Europe: a case report and literature review. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 118(9) 580–588.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trae037

Mueller, L. J., Schmidt, M. L., Ciesek, S., Corman, V. M., & Berlin/Frankfurt/Munich Group for the Study of Rat HEV (2025). Presence but low detection rate of rat hepatitis E virus in patients in Germany 2022–2024. Journal of Hepatology, 83(3), e146–e148.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2025.05.023

Opsteegh, M., Kortbeek, T. M., Havelaar, A. H., van der Giessen, J. W. B. (2015). Intervention Strategies to Reduce the Burden of Human Toxoplasma gondii Disease. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 60(1), 101–107.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu721

Panajotov, J., Mehl, C., Ulrich, R. G., Johne, R. (2024). Rat hepatitis E virus – a newly identified zoonotic pathogen in Germany. Berliner und Münchner Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 137, 1–12.

Rasková V, Kvetonová D, Sak B, McEvoy J, Edwinson A, Stenger B, Kvác M. Human cryptosporidiosis caused by Cryptosporidium tyzzeri and C. parvum isolates presumably transmitted from wild mice. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jan;51(1):360–2. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02346-12. Epub 24 Oct 2012. PMID: 23100342; PMCID: PMC3536213.

Rodriguez-Morales, A. J., Shehata, A. A., Parvin, R., Tasnim, S., Duarte, P. M., & Basiouni, S. (2025). Rodent-borne parasites and human disease: a growing public health concern. Animals, 15(18), 2681. External Link:https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15182681

Rojas-Lopez, L., Marques, R. C., & Svärd, S. G. (2022). Giardia duodenalis. Trends in Parasitology, 38(7), 605–606.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2022.01.001

Sachsenröder, J., Braun, A., Machnowska, P., Ng, T. F. F., Deng, X., Guenther, S., Bernstein, S., Ulrich, R. G., Delwart, E., & Johne, R. (2014). Metagenomic identification of novel enteric viruses in urban wild rats and genome characterisation of a group A rotavirus. The Journal of General Virology, 95(Pt 12), 2734–2747.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.070029-0

Stensvold, C.R., Larsen, T.G., Grüttner, J., Nielsen, L., Engberg, J., & Lebbad, M. (2024). Rodent-adapted Cryptosporidium infection in humans: Seven new cases and a review of the literature. One Health. 20;18:100682. External Link:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100682

Strand, T. M., Lundkvist, Å. (2019). Rat-borne diseases on the horizon. A systematic review of infectious agents carried by rats in Europe 1995–2016. Infection Ecology & Epidemiology. 9(1). External Link:https://doi.org/10.1080/20008686.2018.1553461

Thompson, R. C. (2015). Neglected zoonotic helminths: Hymenolepis nana, Echinococcus canadensis and Ancylostoma ceylanicum. Clinical Microbiology and Infection: The Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 21(5), 426–432. External Link:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.01.004

Ulrich, R. G., Drewes, S., Haring, V., Panajotov, J., Pfeffer, M., Rubbenstroth, D., Dreesman, J., Beer, M., Dobler, G., Knauf, S., Johne, R., & Böhmer, M. M. (2023). Viral zoonoses in Germany from a One Health perspective. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 66(6), 599–616.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-023-03709-0

Voge, M., Heyneman, D. (1957). Development of Hymenolepis nana and Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Hymenolepididae) in the intermediate host Tribolium confusum. University of California Publications in Zoology. 59 (9) 549–579.

Wolf, S., Reetz, J., Johne, R., Heiberg, A. C., Petri, S., Kanig, H., & Ulrich, R. G. (2013). The simultaneous occurrence of human norovirus and hepatitis E virus in a Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus). Archives of Virology, 158(7), 1575–1578.External Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-013-1646-2