Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 112 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

43

Accompanying discussions on active substance

approval

In June 2015, the media reported on findings of glyphosate in 16 breast

milk samples and described these test results as “very worrying”,

whereupon concerned mothers in particular asked the BfR if breast-

feeding could still be recommended without any reservations. The BfR

expressed scientific doubt about the reliability of the results, since the

ELISA test that had been used is not suitable for the detection of sub-

stances in breast milk and the alleged findings were roughly 200 times

lower than the determination limit that the manufacturer of the test

stated to be reliable. For this reason, the BfR commissioned renowned

European research laboratories to develop two independent analytical

methods with high sensitivity in order to test 114 breast milk samples

from the states of Lower Saxony and Bavaria. Both methods were newly

developed and can precisely determine glyphosate residues in breast

milk from quantities of one nanogram (ng = one billionth of a gram)

per millilitre (mL) (determination limit). This means that these analytical

methods are more than ten times more sensitive than the methods nor-

mally used to analyse plant protection product residues in foods and

75 times more sensitive than the ELISA method (according to the infor-

mation provided by the manufacturer). As anticipated by the BfR on the

basis of the physical-chemical properties of glyphosate, no residues of

the active substance glyphosate contained in plant protection product

were measured above the detection limit in any of the examined breast

milk samples. This confirms the results of the BfR study which conclude

that mothers have no cause for concern and should continue to breast-

feed as before.

||

i

More information on glyphosate:

www.bfr.bund.de/en > A-Z Index > glyphosate

More information from the WHO and JMPR:

www.who.int/foodsafety/faq/en/ www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/ chemical-risks/jmpr/en/

Hazard classification of glyphosate

As a consequence of the current discussions, the BfR initiated

a regular examination of the legal classification of the carcinogenic

properties of glyphosate in line with the CLP regulation (Regulation

on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and

Mixtures) on a European level. Decisions made in compliance with

this regulation are to be used as the only binding legal regulation

for the classification and labelling of substances and mixtures.

As the responsible authority in Germany, the Federal Institute for

Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) prepared a recommenda-

tion to change the legal classification of glyphosate in consulta-

tion with the other responsible German authorities (UBA, BVL

and BAuA) and submitted it to the European Chemicals Agency

(ECHA). The recommendation for the harmonisation of classifica-

tion and labelling is as follows:

>

Serious eye damage Category 1,

H318: “Causes serious eye damage”.

>

Specific target organ toxicity with repeated exposure Category 2,

H373: “May cause damage to organs through prolonged

or repeated exposure”.

>

Hazard to aquatic environment long-term Category Chronic 2,

H411: “Toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects”.

Main Topics 2015

|

Glyphosate