You are here:
Risk communication
Risk communication is an important task of the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). It is defined as a continuous and interactive process and characterised by a participatory dialogue with various stakeholders. Hence, risk communication extends far beyond providing information to all those concerned and to interested circles about the Institute’s assessment work and its findings. Providing timely information to the public at large about possible health risks, findings and work results is the basis for this dialogue.
Risk communication principles
In its risk communication activities, BfR upholds three principles in order to raise the confidence of all the stakeholders in the risk assessment process:
- Transparency
- Reliability
- Greatest possible openness
Goal of a participatory dialogue
The goal of a participatory dialogue is to establish whether there are differences in the perception, assessment and handling of risks amongst the various stakeholders and interest groups. Only when there is an awareness of the values and norms on which the individual risk assessments of the participants in the dialogue are based, can they be taken into account. A dialogue of this kind may end in consensus or dissent about assessments and management options. Nevertheless, each dialogue provides valuable insight for risk managers and the decisions they take.
Stakeholders
The stakeholders of BfR and, by extension, its risk communication are wide-ranging. They include
- federal government and federal state ministries, agencies on the municipal, regional and federal levels
- consumer associations and their interest groups
- scientific institutions
- national and international agencies and organisations
- business community and trade associations
- media.
Besides the media, the consumer advice centres, Stiftung Warentest or the Information Service Consumer Protection, Food, Agriculture (aid) are important multipliers when it comes to providing the public at large with information.
other
(1 document)| Date | Title | Größe |
|---|---|---|
|
01.02.2006 European Commission Special Eurobarometer |
Risk Issues - Executive Summary on Food Safety |
525.0 KB
|
Press information
(12 documents)| Date | Title | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
|
07.09.2005 28/2005 |
Crises cost money, dent confidence and create opportunities | |
|
26.09.2005 29/2005 |
Risk communication: More than a targeted exchange of information | |
|
04.11.2005 34/2005 |
BfR makes its knowledge "easily accessible" to everyone | |
|
22.08.2006 23/2006 |
More proactive communication on nanotechnology! | |
|
19.12.2007 23/2007 |
The majority of consumers view the development of nanotechnology favourably | |
|
10.11.2008 21/2008 |
Positive image of nanotechnology in the media | |
|
18.11.2008 23/2008 |
Risk assessment and risk communication: Good rating for BfR | |
|
17.12.2008 28/2008 |
Theory and Practice of Risk Communication | |
|
26.02.2010 04/2010 |
"Risk" or "hazard"? Experts do not all distinguish between these two terms in the same way | |
|
12.03.2010 05/2010 |
Natural and social sciences jointly research, assess and communicate risks | |
|
23.03.2011 09/2011 |
Science in the service of humanity online | |
|
19.04.2013 10/2013 |
Risk at a glance | risk profile |